Pages

Sunday, 2 April 2017

Savile accuser stands trial

This one 


A little bird tipped me off a few days ago. Being a responsible blogger I wanted to be sure it was true. A contact sent me extracts from Steven George's Facebook page ! 




Goodness Gracious, yesterday I looked for Steven on twitter to make doubly sure. If he was singing on FB maybe he'd be doing the same there. No luck, then today I found this. My memory is not so hot at the moment, he uses his pen name on twitter. He has some brass neck I'll give him that 





His alleged crime ?


Strange how the MSM are NOT reporting on this 

I've done several blogs about Steven George - I knew I'd be going back to Broadmoor again and again .... 

http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/convincing-bill.html 

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

Liz Dux, her heart and her 'one accuser'

Remember how excited we all got when the mail on Sunday published this ray of hope ? 

 Well, that was just one of two articles printed in the press, seriously challenging the authenticity of the Savile claims. There's been no more since ! In fact, we don't even know what - if anything, happened  the so-called 'criminal inquiry'. What a bloody let down. Where's the bloody outrage ? Rhetorical questions folks - I've long since given up hoping anyone would answer my pleas. 

Think of this blog (all of it) as a sort of virtual time-capsule, and that, hopefully, sometime in the future, someone will want to know why nobody questioned the Savile caper. And, if they look hard enough, they'll find me and a few others, who dared to speak up and out against this injustice. 

http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/?view=flipcard 

Anyways, back to business. The subject of today's ditty guys and gals is our old mate Liz. I was wondering how she was getting on in her new job, and I found this !




Looking good there Liz, you're obviously happy to have escaped the failing Slater and Gordon. Good for you ! But, what's this about the stories that stay in your heart ? Folks, I took the Times of London up on their free trial just so I could bring you this !

 Niche work - if you have the heart to do it I guess. Let's see what else she says shall we ? Let's get to the point shall we Liz ? What about the money ?



 Liz acted on behalf of 'eight victims' of Rolf Harris. Not sure if they've had their 'closure' yet ! 



 Max Clifford's haven't had their 'closure' yet. According to Liz, according to the Times of London that is !


 Now, here's where them who bother looking for my time-capsule get to use their brains in a way that would be inconceivable to anyone of influence just now. Here's where Liz and Co basically slip up. Here's where one uncovers the inconvenient truth that some people are just plain liars. 



 Because last year 



Now, this is important folks ! Even the press bother to join some dots when it suits them ! 


'one accuser' hold onto that will you. The next bit will make you angry, very angry 



False accusations kill. Let me repeat that for my friends here and in the future. False accusations KILL ! Maybe not directly, but it can't be good for one's health to be FALSELY accused of such things at any time. That's just common send isn't it ? Imagine how her poor husband felt !



'one accuser' - who ended up in prison himself 


'one accuser' who just happened to be represented by ... 



 I mean, that's what it says in the paper. Liz Dux represents 'the accuser' ! She can always correct them if it's wrong. Given her form for NOT correcting incorrect press reportage of significant errors regarding her claimants. I won't hold my breath 

http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/jimmy-saviles-youngest-victim.html

http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/liz-duxs-eight-year-old.html 

 One influential person in the here and now, joined a few of the dots, the one's that fell within his remit that is ! 


 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/31/key-janner-witness-lied-about-abuse-by-care-home-boss/

Liz doesn't mention her Janner 'accuser' when interviewed by the Times of London. She does however object very strongly to any notion that any of us might have that most, if not ALL of her accusers, might be motivated by money ! 


“I get very cross with people attacking Savile’s victims as being about compensation. It was never about that for them and they did not get huge amounts of money because of the problems with the insolvency of the estate.

But, the Savile estate was only the first port of call in her accuser's compensation journey. Even old Joshua Rozenberg, the thinking man's hack, wondered where the cash might be coming from. The thinking men who repeatedly defend the right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence, yet forget all such rights when it comes to the dead Savile, even going so far as to actually aid and abet this gross injustice when they write

 





https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/feb/26/jimmy-savile-and-the-complex-question-of-victim-compensation


A month later, we all knew where some of the money was coming from. It was coming from us !!

 http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/15k-for-you-14k-for-me.html

Liz's little 'niche' was certainly paying off for her ! Meanwhile, her accusers whose only interest was in 'closure' and 'justice' and finally getting their voices heard .. 





Making sure the estate (read Charity as in good causes) would be blamed for daring to defend itself in the High Court, she went on and on with her fight for her niche market (read shares and work in progress projections etc etc) 



 The 'amount' didn't reduce for her company though did it ? They got their fee, their accusers got their end and the full protection of the law because, unlike the falsely accused of this world, they can NEVER be identified, even if their accusations turn out to be lies. Like that ...

'one accuser'

And, at the risk of repeating myself .. bear in mind what Henriques said about that 'one accuser'. Surely the same logic could and should have been used by SOMEONE the moment the Savile game began ? 

 Earlier this year, retired High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques criticised the decision not to prosecute Lord Janner in the 1990s. Sir Richard told the Mail on Sunday that he was aware of the claims against Mrs Fitt, which “plainly should have figured” in the decision about whether or not to charge Lord Janner.

In other words, why was this one accuser taken seriously in the first place ? Had Liz Dux's crew never heard of Mrs Fitt who died at the age of 44 after being accused by him ?


After all, we now know, what was always there to be known, had anyone bothered to check out Jimmy Savile's one or two accuser's ! But, of course, the police had already done that, hadn't they ? 

And, don't say no-one ever warned the likes of Rozenberg about the dangers of Liz Dux's particular 'niche', because they did. They even had a big to-do about it in Parliament in 2002. Need I say more ? 









Well done David Rose and the late Richard Webster. Your efforts were not in vain. And, neither are mine !!


 
 



Monday, 6 March 2017

The Hunt

Last night the BBC in it's infinite wisdom, broadcast The Hunt, a Danish film about a young nursery schoolteacher who becomes the subject of a child's sex abuse claim. If you haven't seen it yet, you can view it here 

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03jjbmw/the-hunt

Lucas is clearly loved by the small children. He is a kind, thoughtful young man and good at a job he obviously loves. His best friend has a daughter who clearly has issues, maybe she just needs more attention. She has developed a fear of stepping on the lines in footpaths and elsewhere. Lucas is attentive to her needs and goes that extra mile to help her. She loves him and one day he rebukes her, and that's when things change ... forever.

An innocent little lie 


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2106476/ 

I'd actually for gotten how good this film is. I'd seen it a few years ago, and I wasn't the only one who was affected by it.

 
 Of course I was tweeting about the broadcast as soon as I knew it was on. 


 So, I settled in and watched the whole thing. Unusual for me, I don't usually last more than a few minutes of anything on the telly these days. And then, at the end - I noticed something. There was no announcement at the end. You know, the one where, if you've been 'affected' by anything in the program, you can contact this one or that. If you're a victim of a crime, you are generally signposted to someone, somewhere, even if it's just a helpline that's only open until midnight that night. But, for this there was nothing ! 

This blog-post is dedicated to the little innocent folk who have lived and continue to live the nightmare of being falsely accused of the most heinous of heinous crimes - sexually abusing children. I don't even care about most of the bigger innocent folk anymore. They can take care of themselves. The Lords, the MP's - they can fuck off ! When, have any of them tried to help anyone ? Never, that's when. That's why I hate them that cry rivers for themselves whilst cheering on the mob attacking others. Sorry, I know it's not good to hate anyone. It's really nothing personal, but this makes my blood and piss, boil like nothing else.
 
WHY ? Because people die, lives are destroyed forever on the back of the not so innocent little lies. I didn't hate little Klara who's mind was corrupted albeit innocently by her brother and his pal as they run passed her on the stairs clutching a tablet with porn on it  "look Klara a giant a giant stiff rod". No, it's the adults who do the damage. Children make things up and those who are in a position of trust and responsibility must be that little bit more careful in their handling of such claims.

Because, once it's out there, it's out there. It never goes away. There is NO COURT in the land that can acquit you in the eyes of those who choose not to believe your innocence. That's why those who can, protect their names as much as they are able. Not everyone has money or friends in high, or even low places. Some people have no friends and no money ! I'm on your side folks, always will be ! 





 Thank you for making this film 




 


 

 

 

Monday, 27 February 2017

'Potential victims'


According to the mail, certain alleged victims of Sir Edward Heath have already discussed making compensation claims for sexual abuse .. ' 

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4262534/Alleged-Heath-victims-spoken-compensation.html

Not exactly supportive for the 'alleged victims' or the Police it goes on 


 That would be their chief constable's 'report' allegedly due out in June. It might be next June now given that the bloke in charge of the actual investigation has, thrown a sickie ! 


 The telegraph ups the ante - anti-investigation stance, a 'source' suggesting the negative impact that this pesky 'investigation' might be having on real police work 

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/26/heath-paedophile-investigation-plunged-chaos-detective-charge/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Are ordinary Policemen getting sick of having to believe any old shit because of policies foisted on them by their superiors and their superiors at Fleet Street ? Who the hell knows. One thing's for sure, the paedo label is still being affixed to folk both living and dead, no trial or investigation necessary !

 
 In August 2015 the cops were considering just a 'limited inquiry' into the claims made against Heath believing it would give 'Potential victims validation more quickly than a full investigation' Bit like that 'closure' thing they used as an excuse to NOT investigate the Savile claims. 

Save money, pay compensation or do it properly. The telegraph were seemingly able to draw from a pool of 'sources' for their material 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/09/police-consider-limited-inquiry-into-heath-child-sex-abuse-claims

Sean should get Full pay for six months maybe longer ! Haven't noticed any adverts in the press offering cash for Heath stories, like they did with Savile, so who knows - maybe Sir Edward's old home will be safe. 

 



 

Sunday, 19 February 2017

Ted Heath

I no longer have to explain HOW, Sir Jimmy was stitched up. The mail on Sunday and their chums have done it for me, with just one headline 

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4238188/Sir-Edward-Heath-paedophile-says-police-chief.html

That was published online last night and by this morning 

 
 Goodness gracious -  a 'police chief' is 'convinced the allegations are "120% genuine", or, so 'the mail on Sunday can reveal' 

Problem being, they have revealed nothing of the sort. They have NO direct official quotes from Wiltshire Police - but, of course one has to read the darned thing in order to know that ! I did, but I guess the world's media don't have to bother. Why let your brain get in the way of a good story ? 

One doesn't even need to read the whole thing - just four paragraphs in 


Obviously, someone cannot wait until June 

You see, they have been after Heath for some time. Friends and admirer's of the dead ex-prime minister have put up a semi-spirited defence. But, all such defences now pale into insignificance, why ? Well, because he could drive, that's why !


 'Detectives' ? Note, they do not reveal who these sources are. One can easily confirm whether someone ever held a drivers license - the DVLA could have saved the hack a few minutes research in photo archives but facts are not what these guys are after is it ? 

It goes on and on. We've heard it all before, as I said, I no longer have to bother trying to explain, to someone sensible, how they stitched Jimmy up. 



'Astonishingly' for me, is the fact that everyone appears to accept that Chief Constable Veale has actually said this. No one can have any illusions that Wiltshire Police have an agenda 


 From the independent in December 

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/wiltshire-police-chief-probe-sir-edward-heath-child-sex-abuse-allegations-not-a-witch-hunt-a7453091.html

But, like the responsible blogger I am I thought I'd check with Wiltshire Police myself to see what official statements have or haven't been made. Here's their latest 'update' 

 Of course, the mail on Sunday has form when it comes to crackpot 'leaked confidential' reports.Again, from December 2016



Back to today or October 2012 if you like 


 BUT, and here's a big question folks - will they get away with this. Will enough people buy this bullshit like they did with Savile ? Safety in numbers as they say ! Let's see how many more complainants come forward. In the meantime, allow those of us who give a shit, to speak up for Justice. Justice for ALL, not just ex-prime ministers, but for everyone. And I hate to say I told you so, but I did, didn't I ?