Pages

Thursday, 25 September 2014

The case for the Defense Day 13

Today Ladies and gentlemen I will be continuing my journey through Jersey in a effort to show you how something can quite literally be made out of nothing !
Within a week of the broadcast of Exposure, Allan Collins of panonne Solicitors claimed that a 'handfull' of people had come forward saying they too had been abused by Sir Jimmy is Jersey.
By 15th October 2012, this 'handful' of 'former residents' of HDLG amounted to FIVE !
By 6th November he had SIX !
  Obviously the Met Police didn't read that second BBC story because in January 2013 they recorded just FIVE allegations !
 We can only assume that the Police/NSPCC have gone off Mr Collins' information because only ONE allegation was mentioned prior to October 2012. Remember Ladies and Gentlemen, that's ONE 'verbal' 'allegation' that has NOT been recorded anywhere !
 But, lets go back to an article published by the BBC on 12th October 2012 wherein Collins claims that Sir Jimmy assaulted a 10 year old boy on the island. Note the explanation he gives as to WHY so few (if any) made claims at the time. 
'Walk on part' much bigger .. picture' What on earth is he getting at here ?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-19932105
The Telegraph answers my rhetorical question in this rather sensational article from 19th October 2012 containing a heading since enshined in conspiracy theorist legend 
 And, here is where things get real interesting for the DEFENSE, because it appears that the person alleged to have spoken to the Jersey Police in 2008, that the Police have no knowledge of was a member of JERSEY CARE LEAVER's Association !
Not 'typed up' Really, is that so ?
Now what makes the claim about Jimmy even more dubious is the following 
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9620223/Jimmy-Savile-He-was-the-tip-of-the-iceberg.html
Now WHY would the others who allegedly abused the woman been inprisoned whilst Jimmy escaped without even a typed up statement ? It just does not RING true does it Ladies and Gentlemen ? But it does add something to our submission that the revelations made against Jimmy Savile, printed so incessantly in the press are PROOF that a monumental frame up has taken place. Those who destroyed Jimmy are doing the same to others. The Jersey abuse case has been re-opened. This from JULY 2014 !
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-28408981
But what has any of this to do with Sir Jimmy ? Well nothing but that hasn't stopped the press from trying to implicate him with the likes of this nonsense !

The next day Lenny re-appears 
It is Thursday now Ladies and gentlemen and the Jersey Evening Post has yet to produce those 'full report' s ! Not that they need to in the case of the first which is obviously baloney - It's only a rumour .. ' 
I just couldn't let the JEP get away with calling Sir Jimmy a paedophile either !
No doubt more claimants have come forward to Mr Collins now part of Slater Gordon UK ! Time for another break Ladies and Gentlemen !

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

Case for the Defense Day 12 pm session

Earlier today ladies and gentlemen I told you I would be submitting further evidence from those who took part in the 2008 investigation in Jersey. 
On 9th October 2012 the guardian carried an article indicating a change of heart by the man who led the investigation on the island, Lenny Harper !
What evidence Mr Harper ?
Someone else taking an interest in Jimmy Savile's visits to Jersey was solicitor Alan Collins who was, at the time, handling claims against the States of Jersey NONE of which involved Savile. Until October 2012 that is !
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/oct/08/jimmy-savile-jersey-childrens-home

Let's be quite clear Ladies and gentlemen. There is NO proof that Jimmy Savile was 'investigated' by the Jersey police in 2008 whatever spin the guardian attempts to put on things ! This morning I provided evidence that an 'verbal allegation' had been 'investigated' ONE period !
Now would be a good time to provide you with some background on the case. Some of you may remember the scary stories about children being murdered in cellars etc etc. Here is an extract from the Mail 18th April 2009 by Eileen Fairweather
 And here's what happened 
 Enter Mr Collins and his compensation claimants 
 They are looking for a 'deal' 
At the HIGH COURT !
 Sounds awful familiar doesn't it Ladies and gentlemen ? Because look what happened next !
And thus came into being the "historic abuse redress scheme" to which anyone could apply had they been abused on the Island at any time since, well since the NAZI'S left !
 I have no idea how many of Mr Collins' claimants date back to May 1945 and I could care less. I'm more interested with the claimants he acquires in October and November 2012 by which time he was employed by Panonne. But that will come tomorrow.  I have not finished my visit to Jersey and I'm ready to do battle !!
 As it happens !

http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/JERSEY-BATTLE-OF-THE-FLOWERS-IN-COLOUR/d8a7f1cb80b34b99927bacdc635771ff



 

Case for the Defense Day 12

Ladies and gentlemen of the Jury, were you surprised to hear Senior Police Officers referring to one of our best known and best loved celebrities as a 'predatory paedophile' who 'groomed the nation' whilst 'hiding in plain sight' of all of us, because I WAS !
Knowing what we know now, WHAT would possibly suffice as a good enough reason for sacrificing the name of such a popular public figure ? We are, once again, operating at a disadvantage are we not Ladies and gentlemen ? WE, do not KNOW all the facts, but, we DO KNOW NOW know some things we did not in January 2013 when GVAV was published !
We know, that between 2007 and 2009, Jimmy Savile's name was  being being linked to Haut de la Garenne in the press. We know that on the 1st March 2008 the Sun newspaper published a photograph of Sir Jimmy at that home and Jimmy reacted by threatening to sue.
Exhibit 25  article in the Lawyer Magazine 17th March 2008 
Much has since been made of Sir Jimmy's actions back then. The press now imply that Jimmy was not just protecting himself when he claimed that he could not remember visiting the place. They imply that he was lying, he did visit the place and, worse still, he abused children during this visits.
The day before Exposure aired a number of media outlets both television and press carried a story told by one Dee Coles. Her name actually appears in litigation against Sir Jimmy's estate. Now Ladies and gentlemen, I want to put to you that Ms Coles as she appears in news items is no victim. Like 'Celia' who claims Jimmy raped her in SM Hospital, her statement has been penned for her by someone else. Let's read it shall we ? Not withstanding the story itself, which was examined by Moor Larkin earlier Exhibit 26, her reasons for keeping silent for nigh on forty years just do not ring true !
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/its-jersey-but-not-as-you-knew-it-jim.html
The UK press were in overdrive on the 2nd October 2012. The telegraph carried not one but TWO stories linking Sir Jimmy to Jersey. This one appeared in the afternoon at 3.37 pm 
  Whilst this one was published at 08.19 am
 Lets examine the contents of the pm offering as it contains some interesting information. Not merely about the new claims but Jimmy's alleged explanation about his action against the Sun in March 2008 !
We are NOT told when or to whom and in what context Jimmy is ALLEGED to have said these words but it does cast Jimmy in a poor light does it not ? But wasn't that the intention Ladies and gentlemen !
Now let's go back to that first headline shall we ? Sir Jimmy Savile was 'investigated for indecent assault .. by Jersey Police'. The second article confirms that they 'investigated' ONE Allegation 
 Note they use the words VERBAL allegation. No formal investigation of Sir Jimmy took place. WHY ? because the Police were concentrating on what they saw as more serious claims but I'll come to that later !
Mr Alleyne at 08.19 describes Jimmy as being a 'regular visitor' to the Jersey home. He does not expand on this but his afternoon colleague does !
I should like to ask Mr Evans who this 'former resident' is and, if they are the same person referred to as a 'victim' 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9581859/Sir-Jimmy-Savile-investigated-by-Jersey-Police-over-abuse-claims.html

Ladies and gentlemen, I cannot stress enough the fact that Sir Jimmy and his family are at a huge disadvantage here on so many different levels. Stories are being published in the press, alleged 'victims'  are CONSTANTLY appearing on national television, not to mention, ex police Jersey officers re writing history ! But before I come to Mr Harper et al let's hear from Ms Coles. I'm not so much interested in her story aside from the fact that she mentions that she AND her friend were 'attacked' by Jimmy ! I should like to know WHO this person is so that she can be called to give evidence

 
Ms Coles gives a good account of herself in print and on screen. Her interests are purely selfless, she wants to support others, she wants them to be believed !
The same day she's featured on ITV News showing no sign of 'panic'. The alleged experience does not appear to have caused her any harm ! As I'm sure it did not ! Have a look at those photographs she has kept all these years. She's looking very happy with Jimmy is she not ?
And, is that a nervous laugh she gives as she describes being 'sexually abused' by Jimmy Savile at the age of 14 !
http://www.itv.com/news/2012-10-02/alleged-victim-of-sir-jimmy-savile-speaks-out/


The day after Exposure she appears in her local press 
And finishes
Report it, take responsibility ? Is this an alleged victim or a schooled witness ? 
Time for a break Ladies and Gentlemen. Join me later today when I shall be examining who said what to, and about whom, in Jersey 2008 !