Pages

Tuesday, 31 March 2015

Not worth a bite !

I am never surprised by the amount of treachery I see in the case of Jimmy Savile's ex acquaintances. I did however feel that I needed to react to this
 Very funny for the masses who follow you no doubt. But, how sad that someone of Louis talents should stoop so low as to heckle his dead 'friend' in such a way. 
Then I recalled Jones' recent tweet and the fact that the BBC are planning another Savile film 
What is the devious ex BBC employee up to now ? Especially, given this most recent offering from Theroux 
 

http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/mar/26/louis-theroux-my-secret-fear-is-that-im-not-helping

14 comments:

  1. What did Louis know?
    Not hard to imagine the pressures brought to bear.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Place_for_Paedophiles

    He also had a weird weekend with Max Clifford. Is he tweeting about Waxy?

    ReplyDelete
  2. So much for so called friends. All this after all the help and support he got from Jimmy to move his career forward. I can't believe he would do this

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Mr T has any decency, he will explain himself. He should also consider asking Meirion Jones just what the hell he is squawking about !

      Delete
  3. Louis Theroux gives the impression of trying to do a Nick Broomfield but being more interested in finding weirdness than humanity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has at least had the gumption to leave his 2011 obituary up:

      "In the course of about two weeks my director Will Yapp and I went on a strange, fascinating and occasionally infuriating journey with Jimmy.
      We saw his dark side. Well, Will did – I happened to be in bed on the evening Jimmy chose to discuss his years of “zero tolerance” in the nightclubs he managed, tying people up and leaving them in the boiler room if they were being lairy.
      http://louistheroux.com/jimmy-savile/

      The comments stream is incredible. It's not just Louis who has a "Change of Mind" .... The pike carriers arrive on Oct 12, 2012

      Delete
    2. Oh no.... even earlier... September, 2012.... oh... look for yourself.... :-D

      Delete
    3. Yes, post Meirion muck spreading, the blog took on a whole new meaning. Strange, how LT never answered his critics. Maybe, he was waiting to see how things panned out. AKA, doing a Dan !!

      Delete
    4. ? https://twitter.com/LizDuxLawyer/status/581844287878479872

      Delete
    5. @Anon, it must be a bloody LONG list.

      @All, re Louis...don't write him off yet. I appreciate the above collection of bits and pieces doesn't look great, but the Guardian piece was pretty brief for what seems to be his only comment on the subject to date. His tweet is not particularly noteworthy in its own right...and Merion's teaser - we it could be that he's 'just heard' about Jim's late night chat with the cameraman...

      Delete
    6. Haaa LOL Misa, 'just heard about late night chat'. Brilliant, but then, it's probably true !!

      Delete
  4. I watched 'When Louis...' again the other night, for the first time since way back. I suspect I enjoyed it all the more for what you, Moor and Anna have written over the past couple of years, but it is kind of compelling. And, in it's own way, a very endearing portrait.

    I've never quite been sure what to make of Louis Theroux. He's gauche and clumsy, and really very good at getting people to 'open up'. I imagine he could be a very insightful observer and commentator, but he seldom needs to really comment - he finds a way to let the subject do the talking. He obviously got a lot more from Jim than most, and fair play to him.

    One thing that really struck me, not for the first time, is how much Jim is like so many people I knew in my youth, and not only Yorkshiremen, though there were plenty of them around too. The quick comebacks, the evasions, the silly and sometimes bizarre tall tales, and the endless wind-ups, through all of which occasional pearls of genuine wisdom, and real heartfelt concern, emerge...for those with a keen enough ear, and a thick enough skin to take them. Yet, in a way, that's part of what's under attack now; part of the 'proof' that he was what everyone (else) wants to believe he was. The eyeballs business is just typical of that - how could anyone seriously accept such comments as 'evidence' of necrophilia? Clearly no journalist could have, but plenty of their readers are, apparently, that that feeble-minded.

    Heaven help us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent comment Misa. And, the funny thing is, I would never have known about the real Jimmy Savile, had any of this crap not happened,leading me to research as well as watch all these great shows etc !

      Delete
  5. hey i stumbled across you... i have a video id like you to look at,my speculation of course. you can skip to 11m20s to get straight to it...however you wont see the hollistics of how i came to my point of view.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXH9yS2NfIA

    ReplyDelete
  6. i forgot to mention the Child Okeford link...google search it check the CELEBS that have LIVED there going back 100yrs(MORE so the Childrens Entertainers and show creators etc etc) then check against MP's etc but search For saville/cliff richards cottage story...check the mitford sisters out and the Date of eva brauns trip back south america in ww2 and who visited THE sister in Okeford..the name child okeford#Ford being a smalll stream#Water~#Admiralty law#Legalese(in Split terms LIKE understand~to~Stand UNDER)which is why the Police(~Policy/~Pole ICE)ask you this when charging you with Roadside stops etc ...in unstanding you give away your authority(you and I wouldnt hurt steal from anyone)so he must ask "Are you the LEGAL keeper of the vehicle" tv licence "are you the LEGAL tennant" etc etc anything you REGISTER(Regis~crown king royal~your authority /~ter solidity)is given away/hence you were given away at birth by registering u as a SHIP(an empty vessel)hence your mothers Maiden name*(Voyage)from her Birth canal like you berth a ship in a DOCK#Guilty you stand in the ....?but...ONLY if you say YOUR name(the Legal one you were registered as)this applies to LEGAL(admiralty LAW)not Natural LAW#common law thou shalt not kill etc..once you understand LEGAL/// you can see how children procured by this DEMON DJ was all above board(more water based terms)but unless your ASKING(As~King)the RIGHT Questions,your authority CONSENTS in YOUR silence) then check the surrounding 20miles around okeford for the A-list of Whos who going right back as far as you can look....

    ReplyDelete